Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 26, 2025
Accepted
August 8, 2025
Published
December 2, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 78

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a science e-module based on a mangrove ecotourism project that is feasible, practical, and effective in increasing student scientific creativity in Islamic higher education. This study used the ADDIE development model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The e-module is designed by integrating interactive technology-based environmental learning materials. Data were collected through questionnaires, observations, tests, and interviews to assess the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of a science e-module developed as part of a mangrove ecotourism project to improve students' scientific creativity. The finding showed that the science e-module based on the mangrove ecotourism project was feasible, practical, and effective in enhancing students' scientific creativity. The validation results of the science e-module based on the mangrove ecotourism project were 96.25% included in the category of “very feasible to use”. The results of the e-module evaluation showed that most respondents gave a positive assessment. The results of the effectiveness test showed that the use of this e-module significantly improved students' scientific creativity (p = 0.00). This is because the use of e-modules can develop students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity in solving environmental problems. This study advocates for the incorporation of electronic modules into the science education curriculum at universities, recognizing their potential to serve as innovative tools supporting the enhancement of students’ scientific creativity within the realms of environmental education and technological applications.

Keywords

E-Module Project-Based Science Mangrove Ecotourism Scientific Creativity

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Adeoye, M. A., & Jimoh, H. A. (2023). Problem-solving skills among 21st-century learners toward creativity and innovation ideas. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 6(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v6i1.62708
  2. Ainjärv, H., & Laas, K. (2024). Applying constructivism in driving teacher education: analysis based on transcripts of videotaped lessons. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 100, 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.12.004
  3. Akram, H., Hussain, S., Mazumdar, P., Chua, K. O., Butt, T. E., & Harikrishna, J. A. (2023). Mangrove health: A review of functions, threats, and challenges associated with mangrove management practices. Forests, 14(9), 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091698
  4. Arifanti, V. B., Sidik, F., Mulyanto, B., Susilowati, A., Wahyuni, T., Yuniarti, N., and Novita, N. (2022). Challenges and strategies for sustainable mangrove management in Indonesia: a review. Forests, 13(5), 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050695
  5. Asyari, A., Meiliyadi, L. A. D., Sucilestari, R., and Arizona, K. (2024). Exploring student creativity and collaboration through project-based learning with google sites. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 308-322. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i2.40215
  6. Ates, C. B., & Aktamis, H. (2024). Investigating the effects of creative educational modules blended with cognitive research trust (CoRT) techniques and problem based learning (PBL) on students' scientific creativity skills and perceptions in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101471
  7. Aydin, A., Gürsoy, A., & Karal, H. (2023). Mobile care app development process: using the ADDIE model to manage symptoms after breast cancer surgery (step 1). Discover Oncology, 14(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-023-00676-5
  8. Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
  9. Bhagarathi, L. K., & DaSilva, P. N. (2024). Impacts and implications of anthropogenic activities on mangrove forests: A review. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 11(1), 040-059. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.1.0074
  10. Bhowmik, A. K., Padmanaban, R., Cabral, P., & Romeiras, M. M. (2022). Global mangrove deforestation and its interacting social-ecological drivers: A systematic review and synthesis. Sustainability, 14(8), 4433. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084433
  11. Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2024). Conditional indirect effects of clarity on students’ information processing: disentangling sources of cognitive load. Communication Education, 73(3), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2024.2303438
  12. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE Approach. In Spinger. Spinger. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
  13. Chappell, K., & Hetherington, L. (2024). Creative pedagogies in digital STEAM practices: natural, technological and cultural entanglements for powerful learning and activism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19(1), 77-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10200-4
  14. Cheng, S. T., Liu, S., Ou-Yang, B., Dai, X. Y., & Cheng, L. (2022). Specific effects of characteristics of enriched environment on innovative problem solving by animals. Psychological Science, 33(7), 1097-1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211070562
  15. Das, M., Lau, N., Zhang, W., Tang, K., & Leung, D. (2025). Comparative study exploring personality-communication correlation in design students and its impact on offline/online collaborative learning. The International Journal of Design Education, 19(1), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-128X/CGP/v19i01/29-55
  16. Davis, E. A. (2021). Commentary: Instructional materials supporting teachers’ professional learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(7), 836-841. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1915606
  17. Del Cid-Alvarado, R. J., López, O. R., Rodríguez-González, P. M., and Feás-Vázquez, J. (2024). Social perception and engagement in mangrove restoration: A case study in Central America. Land, 13(11), 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111783
  18. Dilnoza, Q. (2023). Fostering Creativity Skills in Primary Pupils: A Case Study on Technology Science. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 3(06), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.37547/social-fsshj-03-06-08
  19. Hasim, H. (2021). Mangrove ecosystem, seagrass, coral reef: Its role in self-purification and carrying capacity in coastal areas. International Journal Papier Advance and Scientific Review, 2(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.47667/ijpasr.v2i1.93
  20. Hayati, R. S., Ma’rifah, D. R., & Irmawanty, I. (2024). Marine education through experiential and joyful learning-marine edutourism based on potential of lantebung mangrove ecosystem to improve student’s ocean literacy. Lingua, 20(2), 189-208.https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v20i2.4153
  21. Horn, A., Urias, E., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2022). Epistemic stability and epistemic adaptability: interdisciplinary knowledge integration competencies for complex sustainability issues. Sustainability Science, 17(5), 1959-1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01113-2
  22. Hussain, F. (2023). Environmental activism and community engagement: A case study of the save our mangroves campaign in Mumbai. Review Journal of Social Psychology and Social Works, 1(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.71145/rjsp.v1i1.7
  23. Indriati, L., Mai, N., & Yeen-Ju, H. T. (2024). Enhancing authentic assessment in large-class design education through authentic project-based learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(9), 432-452. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.9.22
  24. Jia, L., Jalaludin, N. A., & Rasul, M. S. (2023). Design thinking and project-based learning (DT-PBL): A review of the literature. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(8), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.20
  25. John, J., Nandhini, A. R., Velayudhaperumal Chellam, P., & Sillanpää, M. (2022). Microplastics in mangroves and coral reef ecosystems: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(1), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01326-4
  26. Jongmans, E., Jeannot, F., Liang, L., & Dampérat, M. (2022). Impact of website visual design on user experience and website evaluation: The sequential mediating roles of usability and pleasure. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(17-18), 2078-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2085315
  27. Khan, W. R., Nazre, M., Akram, S., Anees, S. A., Mehmood, K., Ibrahim, F. H., ... and Zhu, X. (2024). Assessing the productivity of the matang mangrove forest reserve: Review of one of the best-managed mangrove forests. Forests, 15(5), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15050747
  28. Kleftodimos, A. (2024). Computer-Animated Videos in Education: A Comprehensive Review and Teacher Experiences from Animation Creation. Digital, 4(3), 613-647. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4030031
  29. Lampropoulos, G., & Kinshuk. (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1691-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3
  30. Lin, W., Zaman, S. I., Jamil, S., & Khan, S. A. (2023). Students engagement in distant learning: How much influence do the critical factors have for success in academic performance?. Psychology in the Schools, 60(7), 2373-2394. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22858
  31. Mardianton, M., Amar, S., & Irianto, A. (2024). Empowering mangrove ecotourism: Integrating governance, community, and technology for sustainable coastal development. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 3153-3167. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4953
  32. Mdodana-Zide, L. (2024). Using ADDIE model for scaffolded learning and teaching intervention. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.28
  33. Mualimin, M., & Pamungkas, R. (2024). Holistic higher-order thinking in solving environmental problems: A profile of Indonesian undergraduate students. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(3), 804-812. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v10i3. 36426
  34. Oschepkov, A. A., Kidinov, A. V., Babieva, N. S., Vrublevskiy, A. S., Egorova, E. V., and Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). STEM technology-based model helps create an educational environment for developing students' technical and creative thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), em2110. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12033
  35. Sayaf, A. M. (2023). Adoption of e-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education. Heliyon, 9(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13014
  36. Siriphatcharachot, P., Sukkamart, A., Thongkaw, A., Pimdee, P., and Moto, S. (2025). High school student creativity, innovation, and teamwork skills from teacher’s perspective: A second-order confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.1813a
  37. Smith, W. G., & Delaney, P. F. (2023). Updating and pre-existing semantic associations: testing can enhance or impair new learning. Memory, 31(4), 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2173784
  38. Sucilestari, R., Ramdani, A., Susilawati, S., Sukarso, A. A., & Rokhmat, J. (2023). " Bau Nyale" from the perspective of science, local wisdom and ecotourism. Biota, 16(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.20414/jb.v16i1.459
  39. Sucilestari, R., Ramdani, A., Sukarso, A. A., Susilawati, S., and Rokhmat, J. (2023). Project-based learning supports students' creative thinking in science education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1038-1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2173784
  40. Vasconcelos, C., & Orion, N. (2021). Earth science education as a key component of education for sustainability. Sustainability, 13(3), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031316
  41. Vo Trung, H., Viet Nguyen, T., & Simioni, M. (2020). Willingness to pay for mangrove preservation in Xuan Thuy National Park, Vietnam: Do household knowledge and interest play a role?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9(4), 402-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2020.1716854
  42. Wang, K., Jia, M., Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Zhang, R., & Wang, Z. (2024). Evaluating ecosystem service value changes in mangrove forests in Guangxi, China, from 2016 to 2020. Remote Sensing, 16(3), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030494
  43. Zhou, T., & Colomer, J. (2024). Cooperative learning promoting cultural diversity and individual accountability: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060567
  44. Zhu, C., Klapwijk, R., Silva-Ordaz, M., Spandaw, J., & de Vries, M. J. (2024). Investigating the role of spatial thinking in children’s design ideation through an open-ended design-by-analogy challenge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(5), 1733-1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09877-7