Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 4, 2025
Accepted
November 3, 2025
Published
November 28, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 84

Main Article Content

Abstract

Indonesia’s Joint Ministerial Decree (SKB Tiga Menteri), which prohibits schools from mandating the hijab, has sparked significant controversy, particularly in Minangkabau society, where Islamic norms are strongly interwoven with adat and educational traditions. This study aims to analyze the roots of Minangkabau resistance to the hijab policy and to understand what this conflict reveals about broader negotiations between state authority and local Islamic educational values. Employing a qualitative fieldwork approach, the research integrates in-depth interviews, field observations, and digital documentation. These primary data are complemented by qualitative content analysis of media reports, public statements, and community narratives to capture both grassroots and public discourses. Findings show that Minangkabau communities interpret the policy as undermining the moral development of children and disrupting the long-standing normalization of hijab practice in schools. Their resistance signifies a strong assertion of educational autonomy and reflects a challenge to the state’s attempt to centralize religious policy. This contestation is rooted not only in religious doctrine but also in cultural heritage and communal identity. The Minangkabau reaction highlights the persistent dissonance between national education policies and local religious-cultural frameworks, demonstrating that uniform regulations may fail to accommodate Indonesia’s plural sociocultural landscape. The study underscores the need for culturally responsive policy-making in Islamic education, encouraging future decisions to integrate local values, community participation, and context-sensitive approaches to avoid conflict and strengthen policy legitimacy.

Keywords

Hijab Policy Islamic Education Minangkabau Society Religious Identity

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abdullah, T. (1966). Adat and Islam: An Examination of Conflict In Minangkabau. JSTOR, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350753
  2. Abdullah, T. (2018). Sekolah dan Politik: Pergolakan Kaum Muda di Sumatera Barat. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah.
  3. Ahmed, S., & Gorey, K. M. (2023). Employment discrimination faced by Muslim women wearing the hijab: exploratory meta-analysis. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 32(3), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2020.1870601
  4. Akou, H. M. (2021). The politics of covering the face: from the ‘burqa ban’ to the facekini. Fashion Theory, 25(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2018.1546491
  5. Aladsani, H. K. (2022). A narrative approach to university instructors’ stories about promoting student engagement during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S165–S181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1922958
  6. Alhassan, A., and Németh, J. (2023). The non-sexist public space in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Planning Practice & Research, 38(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2172098
  7. Aloraini, A., Addweesh, A., Beyari, M., Alkhateb, M., Beyari, M., Alkhateeb, M., Al Ahmed, R., Alotaibi, A., & Altoijry, A. (2024). Public Perceptions of Surgeon Attire in Saudi Arabia. Patient Preference and Adherence, 18, 2373–2380. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S488725
  8. Ang, S., Ho, E. L.-E., and Yeoh, B. S. A. (2022). Migration and new racism beyond colour and the “West”: co-ethnicity, intersectionality and postcoloniality. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 45(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2021.1925321
  9. Azim, K. A., & Happel-Parkins, A. (2019). Veiled aggression: Saudi women international students’ experiences of microcolonization in the United States. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1522010
  10. Berenschot, W., and van Klinken, G. (2018). Informality and citizenship: the everyday state in Indonesia. Citizenship Studies, 22(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1445494
  11. Bourchier, D. M. (2019). Two Decades of Ideological Contestation in Indonesia: From Democratic Cosmopolitanism to Religious Nationalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 49(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1590620
  12. Brayson, K. (2021). Islamophobia, Islamic dress and precarious bodies. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1865737
  13. Brooks, M. C., Ezzani, M. D., Sai, Y., & Sanjakdar, F. (2023). Racialization of Muslim students in Australia, Ireland, and the United States: cross-cultural perspectives. Race Ethnicity and Education, 26(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1997977
  14. Burhanuddin, N., and Khairuddin. (2022). The Radicalism Prevention Through Academic Policies At State Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia. Ulumuna, 26(2), 363–391. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v26i2.511
  15. Burhanuddin, N., Pasilaputra, D., & Wirman, H. P. (2020). Pluralism and Religious Conflict in the Frame of Regional Autonomy in West Sumatra. Addin, 14(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v14i2.8666
  16. Chaudry, I. (2021). “I felt like I was being watched”: The hypervisibility of Muslim students in higher education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1769603
  18. Cheng, J. E. (2019). Religiosity, Integration and Sport: Muslim Women Playing Australian Rules Football. Journal of Australian Studies, 43(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2019.1577287
  19. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  20. Elfira, M. (2006). Minangkabau Oral Literature in the Post Orde Baru Era. Redefining the Concept of Literature. Retrieved from https://doi.org/http://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-01_Mina%20Elfira_word%202003.pdf
  21. Elfira, M. (2019). Harmonisasi Adat Matrilineal Dan Islam Dalam Roman Bako Karya Darman Moenir : Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa, 33–34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/riksabahasa
  22. Fattali, H., and Smith, Å. W. (2023). Learning from the outsiders-within: wearing the niqab in Swedish teacher profession and training. Race Ethnicity and Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2023.2183515
  23. Fernández de Casadevante, M. (2023). Overcoming cultural barriers resulting from religious diversity. Church, Communication and Culture, 8(1), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23753234.2023.2170898
  24. Hefner, R. W. (2017). Christians, Conflict, and Citizenship in Muslim-Majority Indonesia. Review of Faith and International Affairs, 15(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2017.1284403
  25. Hefner, R. W. (2019). Whatever Happened to Civil Islam? Islam and Democratisation in Indonesia, 20 Years On. Asian Studies Review, 43(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.1625865
  26. Hilal, Y. Y., Mifsud, D., & Hammad, W. (2024). Female educational leadership in the Arab world: a systematic review of published research literature. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 00(00), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2024.2316655
  27. Huda, Y. (2008). Islamic Law Versus Adat: Debate about Inheritence Law and the Rise of Capitalism in Minangkabau. Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal of Islmaic Studies, 15(2), 201–289. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v15i2.531
  28. Huda, Y. (2020). Islamic Sharia in Aceh and Its Implications in Other Regions in Indonesia. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 5(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.98
  29. Jubba, H., Awang, J., Qodir, Z., Hannani, & Pabbajah, M. (2022). The contestation between conservative and moderate Muslims in promoting Islamic moderatism in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2116162
  30. Kamal, M., & Rozi, S. (2020). The Cultured Islam: The Boundary of Islamic Identity Between the Minangkabau and Mandailing Ethnics. El-Harakah, 22(2), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v22i2.9021
  31. Kosim, M., Muqoddam, F., Mubarok, F., & Laila, N. Q. (2023). The dynamics of Islamic education policies in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172930
  32. Mahmood, A., Arshad, M. A., Ahmed, A., Akhtar, S., & Rafique, Z. (2015). Establishing Linkages between Intelligence, Emotional and Spiritual Quotient on Employees Performance in Government Sector of Pakistan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6), 553–560. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p553
  33. Munir, M., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2018, July). The Local Genius Values of Minangkabau Society. In International Conference of Communication Science Research (ICCSR 2018). 302–306. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccsr-18.2018.67
  35. Najib, K., & Teeple Hopkins, C. (2020). Geographies of Islamophobia. Social & Cultural Geography, 21(4), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1705993
  36. Öztürk, E., Serdar, A., & Nygren, K. G. (2022). The veil as an object of right-wing populist politics: a comparative perspective of Turkey, Sweden, and France. Identities, 29(4), 538–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2022.2029067
  37. Qodir, Z., Jubba, H., Hidayati, M., & Mutiarin, D. (2022). The Formalization of Sharia in Aceh to Discipline the Female Body. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 60(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2022.601.63-90
  38. Ramakrishna, K. (2019). ‘Diagnosing “extremism”: the case of “Muscular” Secularism in Singapore.’ Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 11(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1551919
  39. Rozi, S. (2012). Negosias Islam Kultural dalam Gerakan Paderi Rao di Sumatera Tengah (1820-1833). Kalam: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, 10(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v6i1.396
  40. Salam-Salmaoui, R., Hassan, S., & Salam, S. (2025). Virtual Madrasas: Digital Governmentality and the Shaping of Islamic Subjectivity in Pakistan. Journal of Media and Religion, 24(2), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2025.2468455
  41. Saparudin. (2017). Ideologi Keagamaan Dalam Pendidikan: Diseminasi dan Kontestasi pada Madrasah dan Sekolah Islam di Lombok. Jakarta: Onglam Books.
  42. Saparudin, S. (2018). Gerakan Keagamaan dan Peta Afiliasi Ideologis Pendidikan Islam di Lombok. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 42(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v42i1.506
  43. Seggie, F. N. (2015). Academic and cultural experiences of covered women in Turkish higher education. Comparative Education, 51(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2015.1081795
  44. Sirozi, M. (2004). Secular–religious debates on the Indonesian National Education System: colonial legacy and a search for national identity in education. Intercultural Education, 15(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1467598042000224998
  45. Syed, I. U. (2021). Hijab, niqab, and the religious symbol debates: Consequences for health and human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 25(9), 1420-1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1826451
  46. Taufik, Z. (2024). Sharia-based Custom and the Politics of Religious Freedom in Contemporary West Sumatra, Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 8(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v8i1.40622
  47. Taufik, Z., and Taufik, M. (2023). Nagari Madani: Islamic Favoritism and Religious Freedom in Regional Development in West Sumatera, Indonesia. Ulumuna, 27(2), 692-714. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i2.669
  48. Wiener, A. (2007). Contested Meanings of Norms: A Research Framework. Comparative European Politics, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110107
  49. Wiener, A. (2014). A Theory of Contestation (Issue August 2014). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55235-9
  50. Wiener, A. (2017). A Theory of Contestation —A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts. Polity, 49(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/690100
  51. Yahya, I., & Susilo, S. (2024). Conservative Muslims in Indonesia’s religious and political landscapes: Ahok’s blasphemy case as a political leverage. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2392293
  52. Zuhdi, M. (2018). Challenging Moderate Muslims: Indonesia’s Muslim Schools in the Midst of Religious Conservatism. Religions, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9100310