Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 22, 2025
Accepted
November 25, 2025
Published
November 28, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 73

Main Article Content

Abstract

In today’s global higher education landscape, effective leadership is increasingly recognized as a pivotal factor in shaping student learning behaviour, particularly in Islamic educational institutions that balance academic and moral development. This study investigates the influence of lecturer–learner leadership on student learning behavior at Islamic Private Universities in Indonesia. Employing a quantitative research design, the study focused on two main variables: lecturer–learner leadership and student learning behavior. Data were collected from 21 Islamic Private Universities, involving 501 lecturers and 708 students, resulting in 1,209 valid questionnaire responses. The findings demonstrate that lecturer–learner leadership has a significant, positive effect on student learning behaviour. When lecturers embody strong leadership qualities in their interactions with students, such as guidance, support, and ethical modelling, students display more constructive, engaged, and independent learning behaviors. This emphasizes the crucial role of lecturer–learner dynamics in fostering both academic achievement and personal growth. The results highlight the importance of integrating learner-centered leadership values into the educational framework of Islamic universities. For Islamic higher education to meet global standards, institutions must empower lecturers with leadership competencies that cultivate active, ethical, and independent learners, thereby enhancing both educational quality and character formation.

Keywords

Educational Leadership Islamic Higher Education Lecturer–Learner Leadership Private Universities Student Learning Behavior

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abonamah, A. A., Tariq, M. U., & Shilbayeh, S. (2021). On the Commoditization of Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2021.696346
  2. Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(April 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131
  3. Ågerfalk, P. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence as a digital agency. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1721947
  4. Akbaba Altun, S. (2025). School principals’ crisis management and leadership roles in post-earthquake educational environments. International Journal of Educational Management, 39(4), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2025-0012
  5. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1979). Islam and Secularism.
  6. Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science Lecturers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
  7. Alotaibi, N. S., & Alshehri, A. H. (2023). Prospects and Obstacles in Using Artificial Intelligence in Saudi Arabia Higher Education Institutions—The Potential of AI-Based Learning Outcomes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13). https://doi.org/ 10.3390su151310723
  8. Ashour, S., El-Refae, G. A., & Zaitoun, E. A. (2021). Post-pandemic Higher Education: Perspectives from University Leaders and Educational Experts in the United Arab Emirates. Higher Education for the Future, 8(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 23476311211007261
  9. Asmendri, A., Sari, M., Asrida, D., Muchlis, L. S., Febrian, V. R., & Azizah, N. (2024). Transformational Leadership in Islamic Education Institution Through Social Media Engagement. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i2.40221
  10. Assiri, A., Al-Ghamdi, A. A. M., & Brdesee, H. (2020). From traditional to intelligent academic advising: A systematic literature review of e-academic advising. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(4), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.14569/ IJACSA.2020.0110467
  11. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership.
  12. Carolus, A., Augustin, Y., Markus, A., & Wienrich, C. (2023). Digital interaction literacy model – Conceptualizing competencies for literate interactions with voice-based AI systems. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(August 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.caeai.2022.100114
  13. Chaka, C. (2023). Fourth industrial revolution—a review of applications, prospects, and challenges for artificial intelligence, robotics and blockchain in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18002
  14. Chichekian, T., & Benteux, B. (2022). The potential of learning with (and not from) artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/ frai.2022.903051
  15. Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(November 2022), 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
  16. Chu, S. T., Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based robots in education: A systematic review of selected SSCI publications. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(May), 100091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100091
  17. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  18. Dai, C. P., & Ke, F. (2022). Educational applications of artificial intelligence in simulation-based learning: A systematic mapping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100087
  19. Darayseh, A. Al. (2023). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science Lecturers ’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(October 2017), 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.caeai.2023.100132
  20. El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development of students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
  21. Elkaleh, E., Ali, N., Abu Khurma, O., & El Sherif, H. M. (2025). Towards a model for sustainable leadership in educational contexts: A moderated mediated analysis of UAE and Hong Kong. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101478
  22. Fan, X., & Li, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interactive Learning Methods for Enhancing Art and Design Education in Higher Institutions. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2225907
  23. Kovacevic, M., Dagen, T., & Rajter, M. (2025). Leading AI-Driven Student Engagement: The Role of Digital Leadership in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 15(6), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060775
  24. Macfarlane, B., Bolden, R., & Watermeyer, R. (2024). Three perspectives on leadership in higher education: traditionalist, reformist, pragmatist. The International Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01174-x
  25. Mujallid, A. T. (2024). Digital Active Learning Strategies in Blended Environments to Develop Students’ Social and Emotional Learning Skills and Engagement in Higher Education. European Journal of Education, 59(4), e12748. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12748
  26. Parrish, D. R. (2015). The relevance of emotional intelligence for leadership in a higher education context. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5), 821-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842225
  27. Pyrczak, F., & Oh, D. (2025). Coefficient of determination. In Making Sense of Statistics (Chapter on correlation & prediction). Taylor & Francis
  28. Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC
  29. Uzorka, A., & Kalabuki, K. (2025). Educational leadership in the digital age: An exploration of technology’s impact on leadership practices. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101581
  30. Visintini, G. (2022). Reflections on an Academic Leadership Approach to Implementing Digital Education in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 12(12), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120904
  31. Wang, S., Lu, Z., Li, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024). How teachers’ emotional leadership influences college students’ learning engagement. Behavioral Sciences, 14(9), 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090748
  32. Yudhawati, R., & Haryanto, D. (2012). Teori-teori dasar psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.